Month: October 2008

Bar Stool Economics

Posted by on October 31, 2008

From an email:

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100.

If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that’s what they decided to do.

The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve.

‘Since you are all such good customers,’ he said,
‘I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20.  Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected.

They would still drink for free.  But what about the other six men–the paying customers?

How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his ‘fair share?’

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33.  But if they subtracted that from everybody’s share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.

So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before.  And the first four continued to drink for free.

But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.

I only got a dollar out of the $20,’declared the sixth man.
He pointed to the tenth man,’ but he got $10!’ ‘Yeah, that’s right,’ exclaimed the fifth man.
‘I only saved a dollar, too.

It’s unfair that he got ten times more than me!’ ‘That’s true!!’ shouted the seventh man.
‘Why should he get $10 back when I got only two?
The wealthy get all the breaks!’
‘Wait a minute,’ yelled the first four men in unison.
‘We didn’t get anything at all.  The system exploits the poor!’

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next night the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him.

But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important.  They didn’t have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, ladies and gentlemen, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works.

The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction.

Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore.

In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D.
Professor of  Economics
University of  Georgia

Fox News Smacks Charles Barkley

Posted by on October 29, 2008

Charles Barkley is a known left wing mouth piece who hits out at anyone that is a Republican. He also likes to cry about how “unfair” Fox News is. For the most part he is just following the other sheep in a quest to complain nonstop about Fox News but one big reason is that he gets some of his income from fellow liberal supporter Ted Turner owner of CNN.

In an interview Tuesday Charles Barkley stated the following:

“I watch CNN, they’re not fucked up like Fox,” Barkley told B&C.  “They are a mouthpiece for the Republican Party. I watch [Fox] a couple times when there is someone I want to see on there. But they’re corrupt.”

When asked whether he is just shilling for his parent company (TNT and CNN are corporate cousins), Barkley denies that he has to stick up for his team.

“Hell no, I don’t,” he says. “I like Wolf Blitzer and Anderson Cooper and John King. They at least try to give both sides.”

Nothing to special about that as it is pretty much the same talking points that all Liberals use to go after Fox News. The awesome part comes in the response from Fox News (from the same article):

But Fox News Channel doesn’t see it that way, as a network spokesperson fired back immediately.

“It’s hardly a surprise that Charles is a shill for a Turner owned network…. He obviously needs the steady paycheck to pay off his consistent gambling debts,” the spokesperson told B&C.

OH SNAP! Charles 0, Fox News 1. *zing*

[via broadcastingcable.com]

The Wire

Posted by on October 28, 2008

I recently finished season 5 of HBO’s critically acclaimed series ‘The Wire’ and I have to say it’s one of the best shows I have ever seen. Considering the past HBO has a damn good eye for quality TV. In my book The Wire is tied for first with the Sopranos when it comes to premium channel series rankings. Up there with it would be aforementioned Sopranos, Band of Brothers (mini-series), Dexter (Showtime), Weeds (Showtime) and Deadwood.

More…

Patience is a virtue

Posted by on October 27, 2008

Today I saw someone talking about “patience” on Twitter and I was reminded of something my old shop teacher used to day: Patience is a virtue.

Here is what “Random House Dictionary of Popular Proverbs and Sayings” by Gregory Y. Titelman (Random House, New York, 1996) had to say about that particular phrase/quote:

Patience is a virtue. The ability to wait for something without excessive frustration is a valuable character trait.

The proverb has been traced back to ‘Piers Plowman’ (1377) by William Langland and is similar to the Latin, Maxima enim..patientia virtus (Patience is the greatest virtue) and the French, Patience est une grant vertu. (Patience is a great value.)

Some ten years after Langland, Chaucer wrote in ‘The Canterbury Tales’ (1386) that ‘Patience is a high virtue.‘ Sometimes followed by the wry rejoinder ‘but virtue can hurt you.‘ First cited in the United States in 1724 in the ‘Works of Thomas Chalkley’ (1766)…”

Linn County Supervisors - District 2

Posted by on October 21, 2008

I took some time of my “busy” big city Seattle schedule to look in on the election process back home in Iowa. The Gazette Online held a brief online forum for the Linn County Supervisors candidates for District 2 this morning. In that district we have incumbent Linda Langston being challenged by John Erceg (Navy, Ret.).

I posed a question regarding the $1bn flood protection plan put forth by some high priced consultants hired by the City of Cedar Rapids (they like consultants… a LOT). I got a non-answer from both candidates which I can actually let slide for now because the plan is BS and not well understood by anyone other than the high priced consultants. However, one quetsion from Iowa GOP State Central Commitee member David Chung (Dist 2):

David Chung:
Q: How are you qualified to help lead Linn County through the lengthy process of flood recovery?

Candidate John Erceg:
A: Yes I am. I first was involved with disaster recovery after the largest volcano explosion in the last century Mt. Pinatubo the Philippines. I finished my Navy career as head of Safety and Health for the Submarine Force Pearl Harbor a position that needs no mistakes. I was Environmental Health Supervisor for Linn County Public Health which included caring for Jones County . I have a bachelors in Safety and Health and a Masters in systems management.

Candidate Linda Langston:
A: One thing that I think has been useful was my experience at the Kennedy School of Government. I spent three weeks in their state and local official program. The training has been really useful and allowed me to access assistance thru Harvard and KSG. Also, I am working closely with the Iowa Association of Counties and the National Association of counties. I appreciate the assistance of colleagues from around the country.

[via Gazette Online]

Now, to be completely honest I had a chance to hear Mr. Erceg speak several times during my stint on the Linn County Republican Central Committee as he was kind enough to come to our meetings and take questions and explain his positions. This is the first time, however, that I have had any insight as to what Mrs. Langstons background is and might I say it is … enlightening. There appears to me to be a wide gap in relevant experience between these two candidates and I would be more than willing to suggest that the incumbent be tossed out on Nov. 4th in favor of some fresh perspective. I think Linn County needs some of that right now.

Consider also that Linda Langston played a central part in the controversy over Supervisor salaries earlier this year.

Gravatar: Avatars for Comments

Posted by on October 21, 2008

If you look at the comment section of this blog or any number of blogs on the internet you will notice an area that is available for a user image / icon / avatar. The empty space looks like this:

The little gray box with the white silloquette is where the Gravatar goes. What, you ask? [G]lobally [r]ecognized avatar or Gravatar. From Automattic:

A gravatar, or globally recognized avatar, is quite simply an avatar image that follows you from weblog to weblog appearing beside your name when you comment on gravatar enabled sites. Avatars help identify your posts on web forums, so why not on weblogs?

Automattic is also behind the WordPress publishing platform. To sign up for a Gravatar you will need to go to http://en.gravatar.com/site/signup/ and enter your email address. Before you sign up find a nice photo of yourself because you will need it in order to set up your own Gravatar.

Gravatar works by recognizing your email address when you submit comments to blogs. When you set up your account you can register several email addresses. Once you have it all set up you will see comments like this:

Pretty slick, huh. Give it a shot @ http://en.gravatar.com/site/signup/

John McCain Defends the Plumber

Posted by on October 17, 2008

While the media and nutroots are busy attacking every aspect of Joe Wurzelbacher’s life John McCain is busy understanding the basis of the question he asked Barack Obama and he also understands the problem with Obamas answer.

The following the text of a speech by Sen. John McCain:

It’s great to be here in Miami. Florida is a must-win state on November 4th, and with your help, we’re going to win Florida, and bring change to Washington, DC. We had a good debate this week. You may have noticed– there was a lot of talk about Senator Obama’s tax increases and Joe the Plumber. Last weekend, Senator Obama showed up in Joe’s driveway to ask for his vote, and Joe asked Senator Obama a tough question. I’m glad he did; I think Senator Obama could use a few more tough questions.

The response from Senator Obama and his campaign yesterday was to attack Joe. People are digging through his personal life and he has TV crews camped out in front of his house. He didn’t ask for Senator Obama to come to his house. He wasn’t recruited or prompted by our campaign. He just asked a question. And Americans ought to be able to ask Senator Obama tough questions without being smeared and targeted with political attacks.
More…

What American Promise?

Posted by on October 17, 2008

Yesterday I discussed Obama’s socialist ideals and in that article I mentioned his perceived existence of the American “Promise.” My assertion was that Obama’s life and political career has distorted his view of the American Dream which is to give everyone the opportunity to succeed even if that success comes through failure.

Today I received my Washington State ballot and along with that the Voters Pamphlet. In that pamphlet candidates are given a chance to list a statement. In Sen. Barack Obama’s statement I was somewhat shocked to find that he actually showed that he operates on the basis of an American “Promise”

State of Washington Voters Pamphlet - Edition 15A

State of Washington Voters Pamphlet - Edition 15A

Barack Obama: Prince of Thieves

Posted by on October 15, 2008

Barack Obama finally let the cat out of the bag the other day when speaking directly to a potential voter and it was all caught on video.

“Your new tax plan is going to tax me more, isn’t it?” the blue-collar worker asked.

“It’s not that I want to punish your success,” Obama told him. “I want to make sure that everybody who is behind you, that they’ve got a chance for success, too.

“My attitude is that if the economy’s good for folks from the bottom up, it’s gonna be good for everybody. I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”

[via - NewYorkPost]

Video after the jump.

More…

Obama Has Strong Ties to ACORN

Posted by on October 11, 2008